Can You Discharge Tax Debts in Bankruptcy? A Guide for Brevard County Residents
Melbourne, Florida Bankruptcy Attorney | Serving All of Brevard County
If you are struggling with mounting tax debts in Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa, Titusville, or anywhere else in Brevard County, you may be wondering whether Bankruptcy can provide relief. Many people assume that tax obligations can never be eliminated through bankruptcy. That assumption is wrong. Under certain conditions, federal and state income taxes—and even some sales tax obligations—can be discharged in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy case filed in the Orlando Division of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.
This post explains how tax debts are treated differently from ordinary unsecured debts, what specific requirements must be met before a tax obligation becomes dischargeable, and what the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and case law in the Eleventh Circuit say about your rights.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
How Tax Debts Differ from General Unsecured Debts
In a typical Chapter 7 bankruptcy, most general unsecured debts—credit card balances, medical bills, personal loans, and deficiency judgments—are discharged automatically once the case concludes. The debtor receives a clean slate and those creditors can no longer pursue collection. The process is relatively straightforward: if the debt is unsecured and does not fall into one of the enumerated exceptions under 11 U.S.C. § 523, it is discharged.
Tax debts operate under a completely different framework. The Bankruptcy Code classifies certain tax obligations as priority debts under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8), which means they receive special treatment and are generally not eliminated through discharge. Priority tax debts must be paid in full in a Chapter 13 plan and survive a Chapter 7 discharge. Only tax debts that fall outside the priority window and satisfy a series of additional timing requirements can be discharged.
This distinction is critical for Brevard County residents contemplating bankruptcy. If your tax debt is recent or if you have not filed your returns, bankruptcy may not eliminate the obligation. But if the right conditions are met, it absolutely can.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
The Requirements for Discharging Income Tax Debts: The 3-2-240 Rules
The dischargeability of federal and state income tax debts in bankruptcy depends on a set of timing-based rules derived from the interplay between 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1) and 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(8). Practitioners commonly refer to these as the “3-2-240 Rules.” All three must be satisfied before an income tax debt becomes eligible for discharge.
The Three-Year Rule. Under § 507(a)(8)(A)(i), an income tax debt is entitled to priority status if the tax return was last due, including extensions, within three years before the bankruptcy petition was filed. The inverse is also true: if the return was due more than three years before filing, the debt loses its priority status and becomes potentially dischargeable. For example, if your 2021 federal income tax return was due on April 15, 2022, and you file for bankruptcy on or after April 16, 2025, the three-year requirement is satisfied for that tax year.
The Two-Year Rule. Under § 523(a)(1)(B), a tax debt is nondischargeable if the return was not filed, or if it was filed late and within two years of the bankruptcy petition date. This means that even if the three-year rule is met, you must have actually filed the return at least two years before your bankruptcy filing. Late-filed returns can still qualify, but only if sufficient time has passed between the filing of the return and the bankruptcy petition.
The 240-Day Rule. Under § 507(a)(8)(A)(ii), a tax that was assessed within 240 days before the bankruptcy filing retains its priority status and is not dischargeable. Assessment typically occurs when the IRS or state tax authority processes your return. If an audit results in an additional assessment, the 240-day clock restarts from the date of that new assessment. The period is also tolled by 30 days if an offer in compromise was pending during the 240-day window.
All three of these timing tests must be satisfied simultaneously. A Melbourne bankruptcy attorney experienced in tax discharge analysis can obtain IRS account transcripts and review your filing history to determine exactly when each threshold is met, allowing you to time your petition for maximum benefit.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
Additional Bars to Discharge: Fraud, Evasion, and Unfiled Returns
Even when the 3-2-240 rules are satisfied, certain conduct can permanently bar a discharge. Under § 523(a)(1)(C), a tax debt is nondischargeable if the debtor filed a fraudulent return or willfully attempted to evade or defeat the tax. This provision has no time limit. If the IRS can demonstrate that you intentionally understated your income or concealed assets to avoid payment, the debt will survive bankruptcy regardless of when it was assessed.
The Eleventh Circuit addressed the scope of tax evasion under § 523(a)(1)(C) in its en banc decision in In re Griffith, 206 F.3d 1389 (11th Cir. 2000). That case examined whether willful evasion of tax payment—as distinguished from evasion of assessment—could render a debt nondischargeable. The en banc court ultimately remanded the case for further proceedings, but its analysis confirmed that conduct occurring after a tax is assessed, such as concealing assets or diverting income to avoid collection, can constitute willful evasion under the statute.
Additionally, if you never filed a return for the tax year in question, the associated debt is generally nondischargeable. A return that was never filed cannot satisfy the two-year rule, and the tax remains a priority obligation indefinitely.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
Late-Filed Returns and the Eleventh Circuit: In re Shek and In re Justice
One of the most important developments in bankruptcy tax law for Florida residents involves the treatment of late-filed returns. Several circuits adopted what is known as the “one-day-late rule,” holding that a return filed even a single day past its deadline could never qualify as a “return” under the hanging paragraph added to § 523(a) by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA). Under that interpretation, the related tax debt would be permanently nondischargeable.
The Eleventh Circuit rejected the one-day-late rule. In In re Justice, No. 15-10273 (11th Cir. 2016), the court declined to adopt the strict interpretation and instead applied the four-part Beard test to determine whether a late-filed document constitutes a “return.” Under the Beard test, a filing qualifies as a return if it purports to be a return, is executed under penalty of perjury, contains sufficient data to calculate tax liability, and represents an honest and reasonable attempt to comply with the tax law.
The court went further in In re Shek, 947 F.3d 770 (11th Cir. 2020), a case that originated in the Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida before Bankruptcy Judge Karen S. Jennemann. In Shek, the debtor had filed his 2008 Massachusetts state tax return seven months late and then filed for Chapter 7 in Florida six years later. The Eleventh Circuit held that the debtor’s late-filed return satisfied the statutory definition of “return” and that the associated tax debt was discharged. The court reasoned that interpreting the hanging paragraph to bar all late-filed returns would render § 523(a)(1)(B)(ii) virtually meaningless, since that provision explicitly contemplates the discharge of tax debts associated with returns filed more than two years before bankruptcy.
This is significant for Brevard County residents who may have filed returns late in prior years. Under Eleventh Circuit law, a late-filed return does not automatically disqualify the associated tax debt from discharge, provided the other timing requirements are met and there was no fraud or evasion.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
Sales Tax Debts: A Different and More Difficult Standard
While income taxes may be dischargeable under the right circumstances, sales taxes present a much greater challenge. Under § 507(a)(8)(C), taxes “required to be collected or withheld and for which the debtor is liable in whatever capacity” are classified as priority debts. Florida’s sales and use tax falls squarely within this category. Because sales tax is collected by businesses on behalf of the state, the business owner acts as a fiduciary for those funds. The Bankruptcy Code treats this trust-fund obligation as nondischargeable under § 523(a)(1)(A) in conjunction with § 507(a)(8)(C).
This means that if you operated a business in Brevard County and failed to remit collected sales tax to the Florida Department of Revenue, that obligation will almost certainly survive a bankruptcy discharge. Unlike income taxes, there is no three-year or 240-day timing mechanism that allows sales tax trust-fund debts to age out of priority status. The rationale is straightforward: the money was never the debtor’s to keep. It was collected from consumers and held in trust for the state.
However, there are limited scenarios in which a sales tax liability may not carry trust-fund character. If a sales tax assessment involves penalties rather than the tax itself, or if there is a dispute about whether the debtor was actually responsible for collecting and remitting the tax, there may be room for argument. These are fact-intensive inquiries that require careful legal analysis.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13: Strategic Considerations for Tax Debts
In a Chapter 7 case, dischargeable tax debts are wiped out entirely, just like credit card debt or medical bills. If you meet the 3-2-240 rules and there is no fraud or evasion, the tax obligation is eliminated upon entry of the discharge order.
In a Chapter 13 case, priority tax debts must be paid in full through the repayment plan over three to five years. However, a Chapter 13 filing can still provide substantial benefits: it stops IRS and state collection actions, prevents the accrual of additional penalties and interest during the plan, and allows you to satisfy the tax obligation in manageable monthly installments. For tax debts that are not dischargeable in Chapter 7, a Chapter 13 plan may be the more practical path to resolution.
The Orlando Division of the Middle District of Florida, which serves Brevard County along with Orange, Osceola, Lake, Seminole, and Volusia Counties, administers both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases. Understanding which chapter best addresses your particular tax situation is essential, and a qualified Melbourne bankruptcy attorney can help you evaluate the options.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
A Critical Caveat: Federal Tax Liens
Even when a tax debt is discharged, a properly recorded federal tax lien may survive the bankruptcy. The discharge eliminates your personal liability for the debt, meaning the IRS cannot garnish your wages or levy your bank accounts. However, the lien remains attached to any property you owned at the time of the bankruptcy filing. If you own a home in Melbourne, Palm Bay, or elsewhere in Brevard County with a recorded federal tax lien, the lien will continue to encumber that property until it is paid or until the lien’s statutory expiration period runs. This distinction between personal liability and in rem liability is one of the most commonly misunderstood aspects of tax discharge in bankruptcy.
Speak with a Brevard County Bankruptcy Attorney About Your Tax Debts
The dischargeability of tax debts in bankruptcy involves a complex analysis of timing rules, filing history, and the nature of the tax obligation itself. For residents of Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa, Rockledge, Titusville, Merritt Island, and the rest of Brevard County, the Eleventh Circuit’s favorable treatment of late-filed returns under In re Shek and In re Justice means there may be more opportunity for relief than you realize. At the same time, sales tax trust-fund obligations and debts tainted by fraud or evasion remain firmly outside the reach of discharge.
If you owe back taxes to the IRS or the Florida Department of Revenue and are considering bankruptcy, the most important step you can take is to consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney who can review your tax transcripts, calculate your eligibility under the 3-2-240 rules, and determine the best strategy for eliminating or managing your tax obligations. Contact our Melbourne office today to schedule a consultation and take the first step toward financial relief.
Click Here to Calendar a Free Phone Consultation
Proudly Serving:
The Bowin Law Group proudly serves many areas in Brevard County, Florida, including Melbourne, West Melbourne, Palm Bay, Melbourne Beach, Viera, Cocoa, Cocoa Beach, Cape Canaveral, Port Saint John, Titusville, Palm Bay, Rockledge, Satellite Beach, Indian Harbour Beach, Indialantic, Merritt Island, and Port Saint John.